16th March 2025 – Aquinas Trio – Programme notes

Print/PDF

Ludwig van Beethoven (1770-1827) Piano Trio in E flat Op 1 No 1 (before 1794)

Allegro
Adagio cantabile
Scherzo. Allegro assai
Finale. Presto

Beethoven’s three Op 1 trios are dedicated to Prince Karl von Lichnowsky who had been generous to Beethoven after his arrival in Vienna. A composer and collector of Bach manuscripts, Lichnowsky had also been very generous to Mozart lending him a substantial sum of money, which Mozart was unable to repay. It has recently come to light that the Prince sued Mozart and, a few weeks before Mozart died, the court found in the Prince’s favour and requisitioned half of Mozart’s salary from the Imperial Court. Beethoven initially fared better and secured a substantial annuity from the Prince which was paid until the two had a furious quarrel in 1806 causing Beethoven, in turn, to sue Lichnowsky.

Before the three Op 1 piano trios were published by Artaria in 1795, Beethoven had already written a substantial amount of  chamber music: at least 3 piano quartets (WoO 36), another piano trio  (WoO 38) and a wind octet (Op 103).  He probably began work on his Opus 1 trios in his home town of Bonn, but continued to work on them after his move to Vienna in 1792, where Haydn, who was teaching Beethoven, heard them performed.

Haydn advised Beethoven not to publish the C minor trio – the third of the set. Beethoven took offence, thinking Haydn jealous and ill-disposed to him, though Haydn said he was simply trying to protect Beethoven from what he thought would be a hostile public response. Nonetheless, Beethoven delayed publication and revised the trios, partly as a result of Haydn’s remarks, but also to ensure good sales on the basis of his growing reputation. His efforts and guile were well rewarded with an initial subscription of 241 copies bringing in the equivalent of many thousand pounds today. The extended family of Prince Lichnowsky, the Trios’ dedicatee, bought 52 copies. Not bad for the Op 1 of a 25-year-old.

The Trios are rich in ideas (‘When I re-read the manuscripts I wondered at my folly in collecting into a single work materials enough for twenty’) and have many of Beethoven’s characteristic trade-marks. In Beethoven’s hands the piano trio form moves beyond the traditional three-movement design of Haydn and Mozart: he adds a movement, casts the individual movements on a larger scale, and, partly because of improvements in piano technology, is able to free the cello from merely enriching the piano’s bass-line.

Perhaps to emphasise these innovations, Op 1 no 1 opens with a backward look to the Mannheim of fifty years earlier.  The attention-grabbing rising arpeggio is an example of the Mannheim Rocket – one of a clutch of devices exploited by those composing for the technically brilliant Mannheim orchestra; others included the Roller (a long crescendo), the Tremble and the Sigh.violin gets to state the second theme The violin gets to state the second theme (illustrated) whose opening (under x) is reused in the second movement.  Towards the end of this genial and boisterous first movement Beethoven plays the false-ending trick – one that Haydn loved – before a long and novel final coda.Adagio The Adagio slow movement is, unusually in a rondo form with the opening material (illustrated) alternating with new ideas.  Its start (under y) has an obvious relationship to the x passage of the first movement.

Aftera giant raspberry the Scherzo we arrive at the boisterous Presto Finale which opens with a provocatively playfully jump of a tenth.  More provocations follow – a slithery semitone descent perhaps cocking a snook at Mozart’s chromaticisms leading into a parody of Haydn’s Gypsy Rondo style.  But the best is yet to come.  After some daring modulations, the strings try to tip-toe away in a slow  pianissimo semitone descent, but the piano leaps out at them blowing a giant raspberry (illustrated) and then skips away as if nothing had happened.

Frank Martin (1890 – 1974) Trio on Popular Irish Folk Tunes (1925)

Allegro moderato
Adagio
Gigue  

Frank Martin was born in Geneva, the tenth child of a Calvinist, Huguenot pastor; this Christian background particularly influenced his large-scale theatrical and choral works. Much of his chamber music was written in the 1920s and 30s during which time he was heavily involved in the Geneva Chamber Music Society that he had founded. Today’s Trio comes from early in this period. His most individual music, however, started to emerge in the mid-1930s when he developed his own more tonal and rhythmically energetic variety of Schoenberg’s 12-tone system. The toe-tapping rhythmic liveliness of the outer two movements of this Trio may not be entirely due to its Irish sources. In the 1920s Martin worked closely with Émile JaquesDalcroze. “Dalcroze Eurhythmics” emphasised the importance of bodily movement in music education, and was taken up later by “Music & Movement” in the UK and the Orff approach in the US.

Johannes Brahms (1833-1897) Piano Trio No. 2 in C, Op 87 (1882)

Allegro
Andante con moto (Tema con variazioni)
Scherzo: Presto – Trio: Poco meno presto
Finale: Allegro giocoso 

By 1880 Brahms had not composed a piano trio for almost 30 years, but then, like no. 87 buses, two came along at once: one in C, the other in E-flat.  Brahms often started to compose contrasting pairs of works at the same time; he started these trios shortly before the contrasting Academic Festival and Tragic Overtures.  After composing the first movements of both trios, he set them aside and, ever self-critical, eventually destroyed the one in E-flat – despite Clara Schumann’s preference for it.  A couple of years later, after finishing his second piano concerto, he returned to and completed this C major trio.

In the 30-odd years since his Op 8 B major trio, the piano had become more powerful, and Brahms had gained experience of writing for piano with a larger group of strings (piano quartets and a quintet) or as soloist in a piano concerto.  Consequently, the relationship between the strings in the Op 87 trio is different from that in the much earlier Op 8 trio.expansive main theme The difference is evident from the start: the work opens with the violin and cello playing the expansive main theme (illustrated) in octaves treating them as a single voice against the piano. In fact, all the other movements also open with the strings in octaves.  Despite the increased power of the 1880s piano, and Brahms’ proclivity for dense chording, it is important to bear in mind that the Streicher piano that he was then composing at was considerably lighter in sound than a modern Steinway concert grand: “to hear Brahms’s music on an instrument like the Streicher is to realize that the thick textures we associate with his work, the sometimes muddy chords in the bass and the occasionally woolly sonorities, come cleaner and clearer on a lighter, straight-strung piano. Those textures, then, are not a fault of Brahms’s piano composition.” (Edwin Good).

heartfelt espressivoHalf-way through the movement Brahms plays a master stroke,  the tempo notches up animato and the cello transforms the jauntily dotted opening phrase by slowing it in a heartfelt espressivo (illustrated) above ripples on the piano.

Scotch snapA further modification of the opening gives the theme for the variations of the second movement.  The rising third (now A to C) is still there, but the original dotted rhythm is reversed into a ‘Scotch snap’  (as in ‘body coming through the rye’).

Ata phrase followed by its inversion the end of the theme Brahms pulls a cunning technical trick:  the two halves of the  last 7 bars (illustrated) consist of a phrase followed by its inversion (rising intervals replaced by downward and vice versa).  Such devices reflect Brahms’ thorough classical schooling (inversion of fugue subjects was a favourite baroque device), but using inversion to complete a melody looks forward, and perhaps contributed to Schoenberg’s famous view of “Brahms the Progressive”.

The Presto Scherzowonderful soaring melodies again starts with string octaves with the hallmark rising third, but this time in a fleeting pianissimo in C minor.   It is gloriously contrasted in the slightly slower trio section by one of Brahms’ wonderful soaring melodies (illustrated) back in C major.

Stringdescending figure of repeated quavers octaves and a rising third again start off the playful Finale – Allegro giocoso. The piano accompanies with a descending figure of repeated quavers (illustrated) which is extended and frequently recurs as a sort of laughing motif throughout this good-natured movement.

See Chris Darwin’s Programme Notes for other works on his web page.

16th February 2025 – Doric String Quartet plus students – Programme notes

Print/PDF

Benjamin Britten (1913-1976) Three Divertimenti for string quartet (1936)

March
Waltz
Burlesque

These pieces originated in 1933, while Britten was studying at the RCM, as part of a planned 5-movement suite for string quartet called Alla quartetto serioso ‘Go play, boy, play’Continue reading 16th February 2025 – Doric String Quartet plus students – Programme notes

19th January 2025 – Castalian Quartet – Programme notes

Print/PDF

Franz Schubert (1797-1828) String Quartet D.804 in A minor (Rosamunde) (1824)
Allegro ma non troppo
Andante
Menuetto – Allegretto – Trio
Allegro moderato

At the age of eight, Schubert started to learn the violin from his father; six years later he was composing for the family string quartet: brothers Ignaz and Ferdinand on violin, Franz on viola and his father on cello. However, the eleven or so quartets that Schubert wrote between the ages of 14 and 20 are now, like Mozart’s early quartets, rarely played. The exuberant “Trout” piano quintet of 1819 and the surviving first movement of a C minor quartet (“Quartettsatz”) written in 1820 set the scene for the great chamber works of his later years: in 1824 the Octet, today’s A minor “Rosamunde” quartet and the D minor “Death and the Maiden”, in 1826 the G major quartet; in 1827 his two piano trios, and in 1828, his last year, the incomparable C major two-cello quintet.

The Rosamunde quartet takes its name from the Andante’s theme, which had appeared in the incidental music Schubert wrote in 1822 for an unsuccessful play of that name. The play was lost, but the incidental music was rescued from the oblivion of family chests by Sir George Grove and Arthur Sullivan on a trip to Vienna in 1867.

The quartet was written a little while after Schubert had been diagnosed with syphilis; his declining health led to depression (“the most unhappy and wretched creature in the world”) but also to a burst of creativity. The quartet’s mood is lyrical and wistful, its poignant pathos only occasionally interrupted by outbursts that presage the impending torments of “Death and the Maiden” and the terrors of the C-major quartet.

Tfirst violin provides the themehe opening two bars have the second violin simply setting the A-minor key but with the viola and cello providing an underlying threatening tremble. The first violin provides the theme (illustrated) which recalls one of Schubert’s songs ‘Gretchen at the Spinning Wheel’: “My peace is gone, My heart is sore, I shall find it never and nevermore”.

the beautiful Rosamunde theme

 

The Andante soaks us in the beautiful Rosamunde theme (illustrated) which eventually migrates into the minor and an agitated fortissimo outburst before peace is restored.

The Menuet maintains the mood of wistful melancholy in A-minor, whilst the Trio optimistically moves into A major though recalling an earlier Schubert song ‘The Gods of Greece’ whose mood is not one of optimism: “Beautiful world, where are you? … no god reveals himself to me”.

The last movement is a free-wheeling Rondo based on gypsy idioms. As Stephen Hefling writes: “…drone harmonies, accented second beats, a variety of dotted rhythms and quasi-improvised ritardandos. Such style hongrois is apparently Schubert’s symbolic identification with the gypsies, those passionate, melancholy bohemians rejected by bourgeoisie and aristocrats alike, whose wretched circumstances probably seemed similar to his own.”

György Kurtág (b.1926) 6 Moments Musicaux Op 44 (2005)

I. Invocatio (un fragment). Con moto, passionato
II. Footfalls (…mintha valaki jönne…- as if someone were coming). Molto sostenuto
III. Capriccio. Ben ritmato
IV. In memoriam György Sebők. Mesto, pesante
V. Rappel des oiseaux (etude pour les harmoniques). Léger, tendre, volatil à Tabea Zimmerman
VI. Les Adieux (in Janáčeks Manier [sic]). Parlando. rubato

Born into a Hungarian Jewish family in northern Romania, Kurtág moved to Budapest in 1946 when he was twenty. The year after the 1956 uprising he spent in Paris ostensibly to study with Messiaen and Milhaud, but in fact undergoing treatment for severe depression and a creative block from art psychologist Marianne Stein. She was hugely important in releasing and guiding his creativity. Kurtág ‘self-purified’ himself by eating only rice and performing angular gymnastics. He also copied out Webern scores, read Samuel Beckett and Kafka’s Metamorphosis, made stick figures out of matches, dust-balls and cigarette butts and felt as a ‘cockroach striving to change into a human being, seeking light and purity. He returned to Budapest, discarded his previous compositions and produced his ‘Opus 1’ a string quartet dedicated to Stein.

Writing for quartet suits Kurtág’s style: transparent, condensed and diverse in its sound world. Although his stye is distinctively his own, many of his compositions allude eclectically to others, for example: Hommage à Nancy Sinatra, Homage to Tchaikovsky, In Memory of a Just Person, Omaggio a Luigi Nono. Today’s 6 pieces, each about 2 minutes long, are his fourth work for string quartet and refer to: (II.) a poem by Endre Ady and Beckett’s play Footfalls whose central character paces metronomically across the stage; (III.) Kurtág’s friend and pianist György Sebők; (V.) viola player Tabea Zimmerman; and (VI.) the composer Janáček. The pieces use material from Kurtág’s Játékok, or Games – an open-ended series of pedagogical piano pieces similar to Bartók’s Mikrokosmos.

The following poem by Endre Ady accompanies the second piece which mirrors its bereft desolation:

No One Comes
Kipp-kopp, as if a woman were coming
On a dark stairway, trembling, running
My heart stops, I await something wonderful
In the autumn dusk, confident.

Kipp-kopp, my heart starts up once again
I hear it once again, to my deep and great pleasure
In a soft tempo, in a secret rhythm
As if someone were coming, were coming

Kipp-kopp, now a funeral twilight
A misty, hollow melody sounds
The autumn evening. Today no one comes to me
Today no one will come to me, no one.

Ludwig van Beethoven (1770-1827) String Quartet Op 59 No 3 in C (1805)
Introduzione: Andante con moto. Allegro vivace
Andante con moto quasi Allegretto
Menuetto. Grazioso
Allegro molto

The Op 59 Razumovsky quartets were a revolution in quartet writing. In Joseph Kerman’s words It is probably not too much to say that Op 59 doomed the amateur string quartet.

The conversation between equal players of Haydn, Mozart and even Beethoven in his earlier Op 18 quartets here gives way to ‘the heroic discourse of the symphony’ – and no ordinary symphony at that. The Op 59 quartets were written in 1805-6, a full four years after the Op 18 set but only shortly after the third, Eroica Symphony (Op 55). The commission was from Count Razumovsky, the Russian ambassador to Vienna and a very able second violinist in his own quartet. Its first fiddle was Ignaz Schuppanzigh a friend, inspiration and perhaps also violin teacher to Beethoven. As well as playing with the Count, Schuppanzigh had formed his own professional quartet in 1804 in order to give public quartet concerts – a radical new departure. This accomplished quartet may have encouraged Beethoven to stretch the technical demands on the players to match his more ambitious musical conceptions.

The slow introduction of the third of the Op 59 quartets is extraordinary, not only to listen to but also to play. Rebecca Clarke: “One hardly dares breathe, and can almost see the internal counting of one’s companions floating like some astral shape above them. It is such a trying thing to play – wonderful as it is – that the entry into the Allegro vivace feels exactly like a sigh of relief at gaining solid ground again.” Its significance is intriguing. Lewis Lockwood points out its harmonic relation to the introduction to Florestan’s dungeon scene in Fidelio, written a short time earlier.

Two motifs shape the ensuing AllegroTwo motifs shape the ensuing Allegro: it opens with a simple cadence (illustrated under 1), which after about 40 bars of tentative exploration leads to a joyful main theme as we finally get to the home key of C major (illustrated under 2). Only Beethoven could make such a movement out of these snippets.

Angus Watson feels the Andante evokes the stillness of stories retold on long Russian winter evenings – the ticking of the cello’s persistent pizzicato interspersed with encouragements to tell it all again.

The charmingly graceful Menuet (illustrated) )charmingly graceful Menuet contrasts with its assertive Trio in which the viola and second violin (written with Razumovsky in mind?), egged on by the others, lift the semiquaver runs of the Menuet and show just how far they can take them.

 

 

The opening phrase of the Menuet is invertedstart of the last movement's fugue to give the start of the last movement’s fugue (illustrated). The viola, fresh from its triumph in the Trio, kicks off at speed for ten bars. Nobody is to be outdone, especially the first violin, who initiates a string-climbing competition, cheered on by the others. Finally, the second violin transforms the underlying slow accompanying figure into a lyrical vote of thanks and the party ends in a triumphant last fling.

Programme notes by Chris Darwin

See Chris Darwin’s Programme Notes for other works on his web page.

24th November 2024 – Charlotte Spruit (violin) and friends – Programme notes

Print/PDF

Nicola Matteis c. 1650- c. 1714.
Passagio Rotto

Very little is known about Matteis’ early life other than he was probably born in Naples around 1650 and came to England at the beginning of 1670.

His fame gradually grew as a virtuoso violinist and he was credited as changing the English taste for violin playing from the French style, elaborate and highly ornamented, to the newer more lyrical, expressive Italian style.

He published a substantial amount of music, primarily instrumental, under the title ‘Ayres for the violin’ as well as a few songs.
His compositions have been described as ‘ Lively, well -crafted and expressive’.
He gave precise instructions in the prefaces to his published music, knowing that many of his customers would be amateurs, including bowing, explanation of ornaments and tempo markings.
These have proved to be a valuable resource to scholars in the reconstruction of the performance practice of the time.

He married a wealthy widow in 1700, with whom he had a son also called Nicola, and in 1714 bought a manor in Norfolk in an attempt to escape the demands of living in London.
He lived a life of luxury, but according to the contemporary diarist Roger North, ‘ an excess of pleasures threw him into a dropsyes, and so he became poor. And dyed miserable’!

Passagio Rotto ( broken passages) comes from The Second Part of Ayres for the Violin.

 

Johann Sebastian Bach 1685-1750
Sonata for violin and continuo in E minor BWV 1023
I. ( no tempo indication) II. Adagio ma non tanto III. Allemande IV. Gigue

There are several works attributed to Bach for violin and continuo ( not to be confused with the Sonatas for solo violin!) but only two, the ones in G major and the one in E minor performed here are confirmed to be by him.
It is not certain who he wrote them for, either for himself, an accomplished violinist, or for his friend Johann Georg Pisendel, the leading violinist of Central Germany at the time.
The E minor Sonata was thought to be written sometime between 1714-17, but was only first published in 1867!
It opens with a flurry of semiquavers on the violin, and after a series of lively figurations, this short movement leads straight into the poignant, lilting Adagio.
An energetic Allemande is followed by a Gigue, featuring some syncopated rhythms, giving the movement an almost jazzy, swinging feel at times, and despite the minor key, a happy-go-lucky mood!

Johann Paul von Westhoff 1656-1705
Sonata for violin and continuo in A major La Guerra.
I. Adagio con una dolce maniera – Allegro II. Tremulo Adagio III. Allegro ovvero un poco presto IV. Adagio V. Aria ( Adagio assai) VI. La Guerra cosi nominata di sua maestà VII. Aria ( Tutto Adagio) VIII. Vivace IX. Gigue.

Westhoff was born in Dresden. He became a pupil of Heinrich Schutz and in 1674 joined the Dresden Hofkapelle as musician and composer, where he remained a member for more than 20 years. During this period he travelled throughout Europe, visiting Hungary, Italy, France, Holland and Austria as one of the most famous violinists of his time and composed some of the earliest known music for solo violin.
He left Dresden in 1697 and after briefly teaching contemporary languages at Wittenberg University, in 1699 became chamber secretary, musician and teacher of French and Italian at the Weimar Court.
In Weimar he met JS Bach, who was a colleague, and proved a considerable influence on the latter composer. He died in Weimar in April 1705.

His surviving music includes seven works for violin and basso continuo and seven for solo violin, all published in his lifetime.
His Suite for Solo Violin of 1683 is the earliest known multi-movement piece for solo violin and together with his Six Partitas were a forerunner of Bach’s Sonatas and Partitas for solo violin.

Johann Sebastian Bach
Sonata for violin and continuo in C minor BWV 1024
I. Adagio II. Presto III. Affetuoso IV. Vivace

There is some doubt as to whether this was written by Bach or more probably by J G Pisendel. It was first published in 1867.
The opening Adagio features some poignant passage work for the violin. The Presto includes a striking descending sequence and a dramatic final cadence. A deeply expressive Affetuoso is followed by a Vivace, with notable moments where the violin and continuo play short phrases in unison, brief moments of unanimity.

Programme notes by Guy Richardson.

20th October 2024 – Olivier Stankiewicz and friends – Programme notes

Print/PDF

Bohuslav Martinů 1890-1959

Oboe Quartet H 315 Written in 1947

Moderato poco allegro

Adagio, Andante poco Moderato – poco Allegro

Martinů was a Czechoslovakian composer who was for a time a student at the Prague Conservatory. Composition was more important to him than his violin studies and he did not take to the rigours of the general curriculum and was eventually dismissed for “ incorrigible negligence” ! In the 1930s having moved to Paris Martinů wrote in the Neoclassical style and was influenced strongly by Stravinsky’s angular and rhythmic sound-world. Martinů drew on his Bohemian and Moravian traditional folk melodies and has thus been compared with Prokofiev and Bartók.

Martinů and his family fled Europe for the USA in 1940 and this oboe quartet was written in New York in a period of turbulent personal life. Martinů finally returned to Europe and died in Switzerland.

The quartet is a light piece which is rarely performed. It has two short movements. Martinů’s angular and quirky instrumental writing is evident and the strong rhythmical character and close imitation of phrases between the four players is immediately clear. The oboe is not seen here as the lead or solo player but is in balance with the other instruments.

The first movement has a genial mood and uncomplicated structure. The second movement is in three sections. The opening chords set up the dance style that reflects Martinů’s Czechoslovakian origins and sound-world. The quartet is rounded off with a short allegro that culminates in a straightforward cadence.

 

Poulenc 1899-1963

Sonata for Oboe and Piano 1962

Elégie (Paisiblement, sans presser)

Scherzo (Très animé)

Déploration ( Très calme)

Francis Poulenc was born in Paris into a prosperous and well educated family. His mother taught him the piano from a young age. As a student he met Milhaud and Satie and others who encouraged him to compose. He travelled to Vienna and met Schoenberg. Composition training was not successful and Ravel could get nowhere with this most individual musician. Poulenc wrote many pieces of chamber music and much was influenced by Jazz.

Roger Nichols Poulenc’s biographer tells us that “Poulenc’s style and the French Aesthetic…are defined by their elegance, lightness of touch and humour but with the ability to move one deeply” For some commentators Poulenc’s music is seen as slight, inconsequential and not worthy of serious consideration, but Nichols’ view is more positive and understanding of a very complex personality writing music from his own conviction rather than received education and composition training.

This sonata for oboe and piano was dedicated to the memory of Prokofiev. It is from a group of three woodwind sonatas written in the last year of his life. The first movement is in three distinct sections. The Piano keeps the pulse while the oboe weaves around using its wide register in a variety of moods. The Scherzo is a lively three part movement with a slower middle area and more rhythmic outer sections. The final movement echoes the Chorale of Bach’s time 200 years earlier. This movement is melancholic and has many references to Poulenc’s own earlier music. The harmonic language of his choral pieces and Organ Concerto for example is reflected here.

Roger Nichols in The New Grove Dictionary of Music.

Sergey Prokofiev 1891-1953

Quintet Op 39 in G Minor. 1924

Tema con variazioni, Andante energico, Allegro sostenuto, ma con brio,

Adagio pesante, Allegro precipitato, ma non troppo presto, Andantino

Prokofiev was born in Ukraine. His mother was a pianist and a very strong musical influence over her only child. He was precocious and at eleven years old began to take lessons from Glier in harmony, form and orchestration. In 1905 Prokofiev joined the St Petersburg Conservatory. This was an uncertain and disruptive time as the arts suffered in the build-up to the Revolution. In 1918 Prokofiev travelled to the USA where he made a name as an opera composer, but he was dissatisfied and moved on in 1922, this time to Paris to join his mother who was already there. He married a singer and settled into a family life with their two sons. At this time there were no plans for the family to return to Russia.

This Quintet is closely related to Prokofiev’s ballet Trapèze and is based on life in the circus. It reflects Prokofiev’s characteristically ironic and unconventional musical world. The six movements demonstrate spikey angular lines and contrasting smoother melodies. It is playful and energetic and the circus is not far away. In the first movement the two contrasting variations are formed from the oboe’s opening theme. The second movement features the double bass whose theme is taken up by the other instruments in turn. The third movement evokes the circus as the uneven rhythmical patterns in 5/4 time threaten to destabilise the listeners. The original ballet dancers found this particularly challenging too ! The Adagio pesante has a drone played by the double bass. This underpins a somewhat eerie sound above with the oboe and violin playing near the bridge. The fifth movement is as its title suggests very energetic and there are strong accents, rushing scales and pizzicato attacks. Finally a minuet and trio with instruments working in pairs. After the trio the minuet returns and the whole piece is brought to its end with a short dissonant passage and a rush to the finish which is led by the viola and double bass. Circus life indeed !

Programme notes by Helen Simpson.